Strange Standardization Behavior in AUNAME Rule Set

Infosphere's Quality Product

Moderators: chulett, rschirm

Post Reply
U
Participant
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: Singapore

Strange Standardization Behavior in AUNAME Rule Set

Post by U »

Can anyone suggest why BATCH REGISTRATION is standardized to BATCH RESTORATION in the PrimaryName field of the AUNAME rule set?

Neither REGISTRATION nor RESTORATION appears in the Classification table.
Neither REGISTRATION nor RESTORATION appears in the Pattern Action script.

Thank you for your time.
stuartjvnorton
Participant
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by stuartjvnorton »

Are you sure it's not in the CLS file?
I've only got a 9.1 version to look at, but I have RESTORATION on line 6209.

Code: Select all

RESTORATION RESTORATION W 815
With the 815 on the end, it must be close enough to pass the uncert.
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

I see the same thing as Stuart, but at version 8.7. Check your classification table. If it's causing you grief, use an Input Text Override.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
U
Participant
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: Singapore

Post by U »

Problem solved, thank you.

You were both right - that line is in the Classification table, and an Input Text Override provided the requisite cure.

Again, many thanks.
Post Reply