Any comments from DataStage 8.5 users?

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

IBM Information Server/DataStage 8.5

Excellent, highly recommended for upgrade
13
46%
Very good, still testing though
4
14%
Good, but you should wait before upgrading.
1
4%
Bad. Yep, it's bad!
1
4%
Didn't try it, would love to know more about it!
9
32%
 
Total votes: 28

iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Any comments from DataStage 8.5 users?

Post by iHijazi »

Hi guys,

I have some questions regarding DataStage 8.5, hope someone can help me with.

1. Is it straightforward and smooth to Migrate jobs from 8.1 DS to 8.5?
2. IBM have told me that stages like "Oracle Enterprise" have been removed for good due to technical issues, and they recommend using Connector stage instead. The question is, if I have 200+ jobs, and they use Enterprise stages, will I face jobs importing/compiling issues? What's the best practice?
3. Anyone had really tried 8.5 heavily yet? Your feedback/notes please.

Appreciate it.
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

With the installer you also get a utility that automatically converts your Enterprise stage types to equivalent Connector stages.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
vmcburney
Participant
Posts: 3593
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 5:25 pm
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Contact:

Post by vmcburney »

The Enterprise stages are still in version 8.5, they have not yet been removed. Connector stages are preferred as they are more robust, have better exception handling and are easier to share between jobs. The connector migration wizard makes it easy to migrate jobs from the Enterprise stage to the connector. Even if you do not use Connectors you can still use the Connector metadata import wizard to bring in table definitions as this can give a better quality of metadata than the Enterprise import. I found the Oracle Enterprise import used to have problems with date fields.
lstsaur
Participant
Posts: 1139
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:59 pm

Post by lstsaur »

That's why I always use Orchestrate Schema to import metadata for Oracle Enterprise stage.
vmcburney
Participant
Posts: 3593
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 5:25 pm
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Contact:

Post by vmcburney »

Last time I checked the Orchestrate schema import process was painful as it didn't let you choose a bunch of tables in one go. Connector import is the best of both worlds, multi table select and import as well as the right parallel data types.
iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Post by iHijazi »

ray.wurlod wrote:With the installer you also get a utility that automatically converts your Enterprise stage types to equivalent Connector stages. ...
Yeah I've seen that, never worked with it though. Hopefully gonna be a straightforward simple process.
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Post by iHijazi »

vmcburney wrote:The Enterprise stages are still in version 8.5, they have not yet been removed. Connector stages are preferred as they are more robust, have better exception handling and are easier to share between jobs. The connector migration wizard makes it easy to migrate jobs from the Enterprise stage to the connector. Even if you do not use Connectors you can still use the Connector metadata import wizard to bring in table definitions as this can give a better quality of metadata than the Enterprise import. I found the Oracle Enterprise import used to have problems with date fields.
Oh it has been removed buddy, I'm pretty sure of that. I've done 8.5 installation last week for one of our clients, all went smooth but I got surprised there is no Enterprise stages. I googled, and got nothing, not even on IBM website. Had to call IBM and they started to mumble for a few days, unless confronted "YES IT IS NOT THERE ANYMORE".

The installation binaries was 8.5 64-bit for Windows 2003.
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Post by iHijazi »

So let's make this topic more comprehensive, everyone who used it please mention the good and bad things so far:

As for myself I had a great installation experience. It was the most smooth, easy and reliable installation ever. The installer does everything from checking to configuration. No more painful checks. However, it's a bit slow, took around 6 hours (on high specs server).

Please add any experience you had here (installation, development, etc..).. And why do you think it's better than the older version?

Thanks
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
ersunnys
Participant
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:39 pm
Location: Singapore

Post by ersunnys »

iHijazi wrote:Oh it has been removed buddy, I'm pretty sure of that. I've done 8.5 installation last week for one of our clients, all went smooth but I got surprised there is no Enterprise stages. I googled, and got nothing, not even on IBM website. Had to call IBM and they started to mumble for a few days, unless confronted "YES IT IS NOT THERE ANYMORE".
It might now be visible to you in current project's palette but Enterprise stages are available...

Click on View -> Customize Palette and got to Stage Types in project... you can add the stage to palette from there...
Regards,
Sunny Sharma.
iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Post by iHijazi »

ersunnys wrote:
iHijazi wrote: Oh it has been removed buddy, I'm pretty sure of that. I've done 8.5 installation last week for one of our clients, all went smooth but I got surprised there is no Enterprise stages. I googled, and got nothing, not even on IBM website. Had to call IBM and they started to mumble for a few days, unless confronted "YES IT IS NOT THERE ANYMORE".
It might now be visible to you in current project's palette but Enterprise stages are available...

Click on View -> Customize Palette and got to Stage Types in project... you can add the stage to palette from there...
That is.. very correct actually! Never noticed that, and IBM just wanted to get rid of me :) Typical :)

Thanks man.
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
eostic
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 3838
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:34 am

Post by eostic »

Ditto to the easier install comment above. I've installed 8.5 on various machine configurations about 15 times and each of them has been a far more smooth and enjoyable experience than times in the past with earlier releases. Average is about three hours for me so far....and without holding my breath. The pre-req checks are great, and I had one install pause for me while I went out and corrected something I left laying around (I had to delete a file used by WAS).

Ernie
Ernie Ostic

blogit!
<a href="https://dsrealtime.wordpress.com/2015/0 ... ere/">Open IGC is Here!</a>
asorrell
Posts: 1707
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: Colleyville, Texas

Post by asorrell »

I have to say 8.5 is significantly better than 8.0 or 8.1 in all regards, not just installation. Product is more stable and only has a few patches so far, most of which add new features.

The patching process is significantly easier as well, especially since you can add all your patches "at one go". So far what I've seen is 3 - 4 hours for initial install and about 30 - 45 minutes to add all significant patches.

I very much recommend using the (free to download) ISALite product if you are going to 8.5. It is a new customer service tool that (among other things) can check the pre-requisites for 8.5 and tell you what needs to be fixed before you install. It is about 98% accurate, only missed a couple of things the real install complained about.
Andy Sorrell
Certified DataStage Consultant
IBM Analytics Champion 2009 - 2020
jwiles
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:50 pm
Contact:

Post by jwiles »

The 8.5 install package also includes ISALite, but it's not necessarily the latest version.
- james wiles


All generalizations are false, including this one - Mark Twain.
iHijazi
Participant
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:05 am

Post by iHijazi »

Great info from all of you guys.

But, any new updates to the stages? Anything that significantly solves previous issues and make developer's life easier?

Please share, a lot would like to know (including me).
Not only thoughts, but a little bit of experience.
eostic
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 3838
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:34 am

Post by eostic »

Here are a few to consider...

Multiple input links to a single Connector, such as DB2. That's a biggie, allowing me to do single connections with multiple SQL statements and one unit of work. A nice way of doing something that has been in Server for a long time.

The new XMLStage. Lots of info on that in devWorks, my blog (below), and Tony Curcio's blog (find his link at the right of my blog main page).

Enhancements to DTS. MQ to MQ and MQ to ODBC for distributed transactions. Adds to the power of doing this with DB2 and Oracle.

Ernie
Ernie Ostic

blogit!
<a href="https://dsrealtime.wordpress.com/2015/0 ... ere/">Open IGC is Here!</a>
Post Reply