##E IIS-DSEE-TBLD-00076 02:07:18(000) <main_program> Error when checking composite operator: Subprocess command failed with exit status 256.
##E IIS-DSEE-TFSR-00019 02:07:18(001) <main_program> Could not check all operators because of previous error(s)
##W IIS-DSEE-TFTM-00012 02:07:18(002) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: The number of reject datasets "0" is less than the number of input datasets "1".
FYI, I've found this online help page in the v9.1 documentation, but it seems like it's talking about the column name itself, and not the derivation.
Yes, we are able to compile parallel jobs with the transformer stage. In fact, we are able to compile this same job, if we just make the derivation a single line.
Last edited by roblew on Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This indeed is complaining about the derivation missing terminating " character. Although you can change the derivation to concatenate char(10) for unix and char(10):char(13) for windows to get the same output. I think you should contact the official support provider.
Priyadarshi Kunal
Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
IBM support has replied with the following response
multi line derivation has never been supported with DataStage. If it did work, it might not have done what you would have liked it to do and was fixed to not allow it to occur in the future.
The job will not compile because constants have to have an ending quote before an end of line is encountered.
Not the response we were hoping for. We'll have to use a workaround (tbd).
priyadarshikunal wrote:Anyways the workaround is mentioned in my previous post using concatenation of line feed like "one":char(10):"two". Depends on the requirement though.
Thanks. I'll suggest to our developer. They're using it in a rather odd way, which took me by surprise. They've put an entire shell script in the derivation and is writing to a sequential file on the server. It writes out the script at run-time, and they're using an incrementing stage variable, which they use in the constraint so that it only writes it once. Sort of clever, but unfortunately breaks in 8.7. I don't see a reason why they need to do this, as the script is not dynamic. I'll also suggest they simply store the script on the server, and call it using a sequence.