New Linux Server for DS 8.5 Server disk partitions

A forum for discussing DataStage<sup>®</sup> basics. If you're not sure where your question goes, start here.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
epsidude
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:14 am

New Linux Server for DS 8.5 Server disk partitions

Post by epsidude »

Hi All,

We are going to be setting up a new server for Datastage 8.5 Server Edition. This will be new Linux VM machines running REHL 6. It will have 4 cpus, and 12 gb RAM. This server will only be for Datastage no other users or processing.

We have free reign to setup the file system any way we like. Any recommendations for partitions? We are trying to get 100gb of disk space. I know that there are standard Linux partitions that are needed, but what about Datastage specific partitions like a one for only HASH files, one for only the Project?

The Metadata, and Service tiers will be on a different server, only the engine will be on these servers.

Any suggestions would be appreciated. We have free reign, and want to make sure we go the right path.

Thank you
sjfearnside
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:45 am

Post by sjfearnside »

I was instructed by IBM consultants to always put my engine binaries on a separate mount point so I would not accidently overwrite the binaries and need to do a reinstall. :)
asorrell
Posts: 1707
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: Colleyville, Texas

Post by asorrell »

I agree - I always have one mount point for /opt/IBM/InformationServer (or failing that, /opt/IBM). I also create separate mount points for the projects directory, resource disks, scratch disks and working areas. This limits the damage if any job goes crazy and fills the disk.
Andy Sorrell
Certified DataStage Consultant
IBM Analytics Champion 2009 - 2020
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

You can add my vote to what the others have said.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
PaulVL
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:36 pm

Post by PaulVL »

Are you bound and determined for 8.5? Why not a later release?

Scratch disk should be local (local attached SAN will do).

Fast scratch is good.
Different device for scratch is good.
Seperate mount for engine binaries is very good.
Good network connectivity is very good.

How much data do you plan on crunching?

Is this a realtime setup or batch mode?
epsidude
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:14 am

Post by epsidude »

Thank you all for the replies!

I work in Higher Ed., and 8.5 came with PeopleSoft EPM. We no longer pay for Peoplesoft so we are now stuck to 8.5. So far the powers that be do not want to pay for a new separate DS license.

As far as data crunching we have maybe 5 hashed files around the 2gb mark, plus a ton of smaller ones. Mostly the jobs move data from 1 DB source system to target DB system.

The job designs themselves are fairly basic but could contain 50+ stages with 30 of them being Hashed file lookups. Not my idea it is what Peoplesoft developed and deploys. They seem to cluster around 10 HF lookups per transformer.

It is a batch system which will have 1 Master sequence which runs over night.

Also does Server Edition use the default.apt config file?
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Server jobs do not use the default.apt configuration file (or any other configuration file) because they do not execute in the parallel engine.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Post Reply