Load Problem

Post questions here relative to DataStage Server Edition for such areas as Server job design, DS Basic, Routines, Job Sequences, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
dssiddu
Participant
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:28 pm
Contact:

Load Problem

Post by dssiddu »

hi all

i have one qry....

i have a data of 1 Cr Records,, while loading this data after 50k records job aborted.. So what i have to do for remaing records.

1- Re run the job once again or
2- Load the remaining records -in this case how will go about this..

Adv Thks
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Not enough information.

What stage types are you using? What is the source? Are there any constraints in the source select statement that limits the row count to 5 crore? What is the "rows per transaction" setting? Do any error/warning messages from Oracle appear in the job log? Are you using OCI stage or bulk loader? Reset the job in Director - does a message "from previous run..." appear?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Raghumreddy
Participant
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Load Problem

Post by Raghumreddy »

Hi
Solutions
1. You can delete the records loaed from the target and reruns the job again

2. put one more hash file to store the record count and use that as refeence when you are loading the data in second Run. (Ex: if you load 50000 then the hash file data will be 50000 as number and when you rerun the same data check for the INROWNUM < Hashfile data then skip. else take it to target.)

3. Set Transaction sife to a number to Commit. So that job wont fail.

HTH
Thanks
Raghu
ketfos
Participant
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: san francisco
Contact:

Post by ketfos »

Hi Dssidhu,
What is meant by 1 Cr Records.

Pl clarify.

Thanks
Ketfos
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

It's a unit of measure - short for 'crore' or 100 lakhs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crore
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

:lol:

Common on the sub-continent (India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangla Desh). "Lakh" and "crore" are counting units, just like you use "thousands" and "millions"

One lakh = 100,000 (but usually written 1,00,000).

One crore = 100 lakh = 10 million (usually written 1,00,00,000)
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
ketfos
Participant
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: san francisco
Contact:

Post by ketfos »

Thanks Craig and Ray for sharing this mystery of terms and numbers.

Ketfos
rleishman
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by rleishman »

Well, if the measure of achievement is that "You learn something new every day", I can go home early. Which is convenient, because I have a crore stuff to do. :)
Ross Leishman
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

To become a rich man you must have lakhs of lakhs of rupees.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
manteena
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: USA

Post by manteena »

Just millions of grnads........ 8)
Post Reply