Stuart - your question about the retyping solved my problem. I had retyped the operands with empty variable hence it was getting empty values in the field.
Thanks you all for your help here
Search found 149 matches
- Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:41 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:01 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:37 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:08 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:23 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
I am completely sure that the pattern is working fine because the unknown tokens(+) are getting extracted perfectly. The issue is with the concatenation of the classifications tokens. whenever, I am trying to concatenate classifications tokens the entire string is getting lost hence its not coming u...
- Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:56 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:18 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
- Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:12 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple variables not working
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11547
Multiple variables not working
Hi, I am not able to get the below one working whereas the one below is working just fine. The issue here is that the first dictionary field OrgName is being populated as expected but the second dictionary column Supressedsub is not working. what am I doing incorrectly? + | + [ {} != "OF" ...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 5:34 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple token standardization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7297
- Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:55 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple token standardization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7297
Thanks Robert. This is very close to what I was looking for but not the same. With the help of the the table I am able to validate if the city is present or not. But I cant process it any further like suppress the city name. I think I missed to mention at the beginning that the standardization is pa...
- Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Suppressing text between 2 characters
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1039
Suppressing text between 2 characters
Hi, I am trying to suppress text between 2 characters(this could be same or different like a double quote or open and closed bracket) Below is the example input and output. Input : Hello (Within Bracket) Outside bracket ( within bracket) Hello (Open Bracket without closed Hello ****WORLD** Hello *WO...
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:38 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple token standardization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7297
Hi Robert - I am trying to standardize cities and suburb names, to have it handled as a single token I have to concatenate the string within the code and then retype it to the classification I am looking for. But the concern here is since the number of names with multiple tokens are too many the pat...
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:41 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Multiple token standardization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7297
Multiple token standardization
Hi, I am aware that multiple tokens can be handled via manual programming. However, I am looking for an alternate way to manual programming as I have a very huge list of multiple tokens in thousands to be standardized to their corresponding values. I know it works when I have to standardize a single...
- Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:50 pm
- Forum: Infosphere Master Data Management
- Topic: Bringing in new source system to existing MDM
- Replies: 8
- Views: 24371
I definitely agree with you Vincent. As a work around I tried mocking parallel processing and frequent commit intervals using clover etl and the turn around time reduced to 1/3rd of the actual time. I haven't tested it with DS. Ill try and compare the difference. I hope its not as sluggish as clover...
- Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:51 am
- Forum: Infosphere Master Data Management
- Topic: Bringing in new source system to existing MDM
- Replies: 8
- Views: 24371