Thanks a lot for the very clear and crisp answer.
A term can move from pending approval to draft i.e rejected with comments. This is a great feature which business would most likely want to use.
Search found 887 matches
- Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:34 am
- Forum:
- Topic: standard, accepted - pending approval, published
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2171
- Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:24 am
- Forum:
- Topic: Importing Erwin models into Metadata Workbench
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3573
- Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:09 am
- Forum:
- Topic: standard, accepted - pending approval, published
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2171
standard, accepted - pending approval, published
Hi all, Back to the forum after 1 yr :) We are in the process of rolling out BG to our data management group. There are two sets of workflow 1st set - standard stage and then accepeted staged 2nd set - this i undersdand. pending approval and then published Can you please let me know the difference i...
- Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Not in or not between condition:
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7128
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Null display in datastage
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4656
- Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Coalesce Function
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5755
- Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:08 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Loading attachments via DataStage to SQL Server
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3611
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:33 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Datastage 7.5.1A Migration From Solaris to AIX
- Replies: 39
- Views: 20992
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Compile Confirmation Window
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4617
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job running slow
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2621
Job running slow
Hi all
Using partitions in datastage against a noparallel table in Oracle makes the job to run slowly.
Should we not use datastage partitions against a 'noparallel oracle table' ?
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sreeni
Using partitions in datastage against a noparallel table in Oracle makes the job to run slowly.
Should we not use datastage partitions against a 'noparallel oracle table' ?
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sreeni
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: IsValid using Date
- Replies: 7
- Views: 23110
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: For invalid xml the job is getting aborted by showing SIGILL
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10053
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:37 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: shmtest taking a long time to complete
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3684
There is a JR on this.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg1JR32113
Is it on 32 or 64 bt ?
Regards
Sreeni
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg1JR32113
Is it on 32 or 64 bt ?
Regards
Sreeni
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Extracting multiple occurences in XML file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3641
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 2:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: Tutorial lessons for IBM WTX (Yes, I am a licensed user)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 30492