Search found 8 matches
- Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: How to control execution of multiple threads
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3455
How to control execution of multiple threads
While multiple threads are executing the same instance of map, in TX eventserver, is there any way to control the relative execution of these threasds....example below. Thread1 is running a Credit transaction. Thread2 is running a Debit transaction. i want to make sure that the Credit transaction ge...
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: v8.01
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2769
- Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: enforcing business/validation rules
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4524
I aggree with Kiran. In my project, I am validating the data inside the map rules. Check for invalid data and if the data is found invalid, set the appropriate error codes and error description in the error file.(Error file is generated as 1st card's output.) Now depending on the error codes, my DST...
- Tue May 30, 2006 4:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: 1 or more inputs was invalid/input card valid in trace file?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 25327
Re: 1 or more inputs was invalid/input card valid in trace f
I guess you need to place the DTD or Schema (from which you imported your Tree) at correct path with respect to your executable map. The compiled map has reference to the schema/DTD, check at DOC element's properties : Intent >Validate As> Metadata Location. You need to keep the xsd or dtd at this p...
- Fri May 26, 2006 2:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: TypeTree Importer- using Classic validation
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2850
TypeTree Importer- using Classic validation
I am using TX8.0 to import XSD to create typetree. The import wizzard gives 2 options for validation 1) Xerces 2) Classic. When I used Xerces option, it successfully created the tree. but when I used Classic option, it gave following error :- ======================================== A JAVA EXCEPTION...
- Sun May 21, 2006 11:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: RUN function not returning correct value
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3991
RUN function not returning correct value
I am calling a child map using the RUN command from map rule. as below. =VALID(Run("LogoMap.mmc", HANDLEIN(1,(C[77]:.:In1+C[78]:.:In1)+ " -OE1")), "000") The child map is doing the correct Lookup and returning the correct value which i can see in the debugger tool ( I a...
- Wed May 17, 2006 6:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: Data Validation in TX
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15339
Data Validation in TX
Hi,
What is the best way for performing data validation in TX ? In the typetrees or in the map rules ? (considering the map performance.)
Thanks
Manoj
What is the best way for performing data validation in TX ? In the typetrees or in the map rules ? (considering the map performance.)
Thanks
Manoj
- Wed May 17, 2006 5:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: TX Map Performance Optimization
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2641
TX Map Performance Optimization
Hi, I am using TX8.0. I have a input Typetree with around 1000 data items and also there are many complex mapping rules. (like LOOKUP) I am using TX Profiler utility to observe the map's performance. I fould following entries in the Profiler report. Function Summary function iterations time --------...